| CodeFlavors floating menu | Sweet Custom Menu | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | CodeFlavors floating menu | Sweet Custom Menu |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 13 | 2 |
| Active installs | 300+ | 100+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Sweet Custom Menu edges out CodeFlavors floating menu on rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Sweet Custom Menu; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — CodeFlavors floating menu's 13-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Sweet Custom Menu's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: CodeFlavors floating menu audit • Sweet Custom Menu audit
Sweet Custom Menu has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 2 reviews) compared to CodeFlavors floating menu (4.7★ from 13 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Sweet Custom Menu holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. CodeFlavors floating menu has the deeper published review base (13 vs 2), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
CodeFlavors floating menu typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (13 reviews). Sweet Custom Menu typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. CodeFlavors floating menu and Sweet Custom Menu both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Sweet Custom Menu" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.