| Chartsy | Smush – Image Optimization, Compression, Lazy Load, WebP & CDN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | — | — |
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Optimize and compress images with lossless and lossy compression, lazy load, WebP & AVIF conversion, and global image CDN.
| Metric | Chartsy | Smush – Image Optimization, Compression, Lazy Load, WebP & CDN |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 1 | ★ 6k |
| Active installs | — | 1,000,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Chartsy edges out Smush – Image Optimization, Compression, Lazy Load, WebP & CDN on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Smush – Image Optimization, Compression, Lazy Load, WebP & CDN has the larger user base (6,033 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Chartsy's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Chartsy; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Smush – Image Optimization, Compression, Lazy Load, WebP & CDN's 6,033-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Chartsy's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Chartsy audit • Smush – Image Optimization, Compression, Lazy Load, WebP & CDN audit
| Keyword | Chartsy | Smush – Image Optimization, Compression, Lazy Load, WebP & CDN |
|---|---|---|
| quiz | Not ranked | #53 |
| contact | Not ranked | #290 |
| live support | Not ranked | #389 |
Chartsy has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to Smush – Image Optimization, Compression, Lazy Load, WebP & CDN (4.8★ from 6,033 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Chartsy fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Smush – Image Optimization, Compression, Lazy Load, WebP & CDN is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Smush – Image Optimization, Compression, Lazy Load, WebP & CDN has more onboarding documentation maturity (6,033 reviews vs 1), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Chartsy typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (1 reviews). Smush – Image Optimization, Compression, Lazy Load, WebP & CDN aligns more with established stores with steady traffic (6,033 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Chartsy and Smush – Image Optimization, Compression, Lazy Load, WebP & CDN both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Chartsy" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
