Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Contact Form 7 Gated Content | Contact Form 7 – Repeatable Fields | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Contact Form 7 Gated Content | Contact Form 7 – Repeatable Fields |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | 3 | ★ 21 |
| Active installs | 800+ | 6,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Contact Form 7 Gated Content is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 5.0★ vs Contact Form 7 – Repeatable Fields's 4.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Contact Form 7 Gated Content; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Contact Form 7 – Repeatable Fields's 21-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Contact Form 7 Gated Content's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Contact Form 7 Gated Content audit • Contact Form 7 – Repeatable Fields audit
| Keyword | Contact Form 7 Gated Content | Contact Form 7 – Repeatable Fields |
|---|---|---|
| contact form | #373 | #445 |
| form | #801 | #978 |
| contact | Not ranked | #425 |
| forms | #969 | Not ranked |
Contact Form 7 Gated Content has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 3 reviews) compared to Contact Form 7 – Repeatable Fields (4.3★ from 21 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Contact Form 7 Gated Content holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Contact Form 7 – Repeatable Fields has the deeper published review base (21 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Contact Form 7 Gated Content typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). Contact Form 7 – Repeatable Fields typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (21 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Contact Form 7 Gated Content and Contact Form 7 – Repeatable Fields both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Contact Form 7 Gated Content" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
