Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Conditional Fields for Contact Form 7 | Active Campaign & Contact Form 7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Conditional Fields for Contact Form 7 | Active Campaign & Contact Form 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 4.4 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 165 | 18 |
| Active installs | 100,000+ | 3,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Conditional Fields for Contact Form 7 is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 4.8★ vs Active Campaign & Contact Form 7's 4.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Conditional Fields for Contact Form 7 has the larger user base (165 reviews vs 18), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Active Campaign & Contact Form 7's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Conditional Fields for Contact Form 7; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Active Campaign & Contact Form 7's 18-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Conditional Fields for Contact Form 7's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Conditional Fields for Contact Form 7 audit • Active Campaign & Contact Form 7 audit
| Keyword | Conditional Fields for Contact Form 7 | Active Campaign & Contact Form 7 |
|---|---|---|
| contact | #24 | #97 |
| contact form | #25 | #113 |
| form | #49 | #225 |
| forms | #90 | #316 |
Conditional Fields for Contact Form 7 has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 165 reviews) compared to Active Campaign & Contact Form 7 (4.4★ from 18 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Conditional Fields for Contact Form 7 fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Active Campaign & Contact Form 7 is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Conditional Fields for Contact Form 7 has more onboarding documentation maturity (165 reviews vs 18), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Conditional Fields for Contact Form 7 typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (165 reviews). Active Campaign & Contact Form 7 aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (18 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Conditional Fields for Contact Form 7 and Active Campaign & Contact Form 7 both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Active Campaign & Contact Form 7" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
