Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Attachments++ | Canonical Attachments | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Attachments++ | Canonical Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 3.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 1 | ★ 3 |
| Active installs | 10+ | 300+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Attachments++ is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 5.0★ vs Canonical Attachments's 3.7★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Attachments++; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Canonical Attachments's 3-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Attachments++'s broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Attachments++ audit • Canonical Attachments audit
| Keyword | Attachments++ | Canonical Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| feedback form | Not ranked | #687 |
No tracked changes.
Attachments++ has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to Canonical Attachments (3.7★ from 3 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Attachments++ holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Canonical Attachments has the deeper published review base (3 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Attachments++ typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). Canonical Attachments typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Attachments++ and Canonical Attachments both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Attachments++" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
