Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Call to Action Block by WPPOOL | Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Call to Action Block by WPPOOL | Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 1.0 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 1 | ★ 5.9k |
| Active installs | 1,000+ | 400,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 4.9★ vs Call to Action Block by WPPOOL's 1.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements has the larger user base (5,924 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Call to Action Block by WPPOOL's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Call to Action Block by WPPOOL's 1-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Call to Action Block by WPPOOL audit • Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements audit
| Keyword | Call to Action Block by WPPOOL | Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements |
|---|---|---|
| faq | Not ranked | #12 |
| live support | Not ranked | #43 |
| live chat | #547 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 5,924 reviews) compared to Call to Action Block by WPPOOL (1.0★ from 1 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 1.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements has the deeper published review base (5,924 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Call to Action Block by WPPOOL typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements typically suits established teams with steady usage based on its published review base (5,924 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Call to Action Block by WPPOOL and Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Call to Action Block by WPPOOL" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
