Side-by-side comparison
| Metric | BuddyPress Simple Events | The Future Is Now |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.7 ★ | ★ 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 12 | ★ 14 |
| Active installs | 200+ | 1,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
On the measured data here, The Future Is Now leads on more dimensions (2 vs 0). Pick BuddyPress Simple Events if one of the points where it leads is what you need.
Built only from the WordPress Plugin Directory listing data shown on this page. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparisons. Read the methodology
Read each app's audit: BuddyPress Simple Events audit • The Future Is Now audit
| Keyword | BuddyPress Simple Events | The Future Is Now |
|---|---|---|
| live support | Not ranked | #540 |
The Future Is Now has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 14 reviews) compared to BuddyPress Simple Events (3.7★ from 12 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
The Future Is Now holds the higher average rating (4.7★ vs 3.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly; The Future Is Now has more published reviews to read for user-reported install experience (14 vs 12).
AppRanks cannot say which fits a larger or smaller operation — there is no store-size measurement in the WordPress Plugin Directory data. What it can show: BuddyPress Simple Events has 12 published reviews; The Future Is Now has 14 published reviews. Compare plan limits and pricing tiers against your own volume.
Migration support varies by app and category. BuddyPress Simple Events and The Future Is Now both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from BuddyPress Simple Events" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.