Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Automatically Hierarchic Categories in Menu | LuckyWP Table of Contents | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Automatically Hierarchic Categories in Menu | LuckyWP Table of Contents |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.6 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 12 | ★ 883 |
| Active installs | 2,000+ | 100,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, LuckyWP Table of Contents is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 4.9★ vs Automatically Hierarchic Categories in Menu's 4.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. LuckyWP Table of Contents has the larger user base (883 reviews vs 12), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Automatically Hierarchic Categories in Menu's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to LuckyWP Table of Contents; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Automatically Hierarchic Categories in Menu's 12-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than LuckyWP Table of Contents's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Automatically Hierarchic Categories in Menu audit • LuckyWP Table of Contents audit
| Keyword | Automatically Hierarchic Categories in Menu | LuckyWP Table of Contents |
|---|---|---|
| faq | Not ranked | #380 |
LuckyWP Table of Contents has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 883 reviews) compared to Automatically Hierarchic Categories in Menu (4.6★ from 12 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Automatically Hierarchic Categories in Menu fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; LuckyWP Table of Contents is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. LuckyWP Table of Contents has more onboarding documentation maturity (883 reviews vs 12), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Automatically Hierarchic Categories in Menu typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (12 reviews). LuckyWP Table of Contents aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (883 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Automatically Hierarchic Categories in Menu and LuckyWP Table of Contents both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Automatically Hierarchic Categories in Menu" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.