Automatic Post Tagger vs WP Typograph Lite

WP Typograph Lite edges out Automatic Post Tagger on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to WP Typograph Lite; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Automatic Post Tagger's 77-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WP Typograph Lite's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Which has better reviews, Automatic Post Tagger or WP Typograph Lite?

WP Typograph Lite has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 3 reviews) compared to Automatic Post Tagger (4.8★ from 77 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Automatic Post Tagger or WP Typograph Lite?

WP Typograph Lite holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Automatic Post Tagger or WP Typograph Lite?

Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Automatic Post Tagger has the deeper published review base (77 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large WordPress Plugin Directory site owners?

Automatic Post Tagger typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (77 reviews). WP Typograph Lite typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Automatic Post Tagger and WP Typograph Lite?

Migration support varies by app and category. Automatic Post Tagger and WP Typograph Lite both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from WP Typograph Lite" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.