Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Automatic Post Tagger | CSS File Selector | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Automatic Post Tagger | CSS File Selector |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 77 | 3 |
| Active installs | 2,000+ | 30+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
CSS File Selector edges out Automatic Post Tagger on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to CSS File Selector; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Automatic Post Tagger's 77-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than CSS File Selector's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Automatic Post Tagger audit • CSS File Selector audit
CSS File Selector has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 3 reviews) compared to Automatic Post Tagger (4.8★ from 77 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Automatic Post Tagger fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; CSS File Selector is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Automatic Post Tagger has more onboarding documentation maturity (77 reviews vs 3), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Automatic Post Tagger typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (77 reviews). CSS File Selector aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (3 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Automatic Post Tagger and CSS File Selector both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from CSS File Selector" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
