Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Automatic Featured Images from Videos | Featured Image from URL (FIFU) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Automatic Featured Images from Videos | Featured Image from URL (FIFU) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.6 ★ | 4.6 ★ |
| Total reviews | 36 | ★ 264 |
| Active installs | 7,000+ | 60,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Automatic Featured Images from Videos and Featured Image from URL (FIFU) are evenly matched on rating (4.6★ vs 4.6★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Featured Image from URL (FIFU) has the larger user base (264 reviews vs 36), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Automatic Featured Images from Videos's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most site owners the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Automatic Featured Images from Videos audit • Featured Image from URL (FIFU) audit
| Keyword | Automatic Featured Images from Videos | Featured Image from URL (FIFU) |
|---|---|---|
| custom form | Not ranked | #682 |
Automatic Featured Images from Videos (4.6★, 36 reviews) and Featured Image from URL (FIFU) (4.6★, 264 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating — both sit at 4.6★. Featured Image from URL (FIFU) does carry the larger published review base (264 vs 36). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Featured Image from URL (FIFU) has the deeper published review base (264 vs 36), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Automatic Featured Images from Videos typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (36 reviews). Featured Image from URL (FIFU) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (264 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Automatic Featured Images from Videos and Featured Image from URL (FIFU) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Automatic Featured Images from Videos" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
