Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Automatic Copyright Year | Rich Showcase for Google Reviews | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Automatic Copyright Year | Rich Showcase for Google Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 9 | ★ 1.6k |
| Active installs | 6,000+ | 100,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Rich Showcase for Google Reviews is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 4.9★ vs Automatic Copyright Year's 4.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Rich Showcase for Google Reviews has the larger user base (1,614 reviews vs 9), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Automatic Copyright Year's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Rich Showcase for Google Reviews; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Automatic Copyright Year's 9-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Rich Showcase for Google Reviews's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Automatic Copyright Year audit • Rich Showcase for Google Reviews audit
| Keyword | Automatic Copyright Year | Rich Showcase for Google Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| live support | Not ranked | #61 |
| customer support | Not ranked | #92 |
| customer service | Not ranked | #189 |
No tracked changes.
Rich Showcase for Google Reviews has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 1,614 reviews) compared to Automatic Copyright Year (4.3★ from 9 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Rich Showcase for Google Reviews holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Rich Showcase for Google Reviews has the deeper published review base (1,614 vs 9), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Automatic Copyright Year typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (9 reviews). Rich Showcase for Google Reviews typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,614 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Automatic Copyright Year and Rich Showcase for Google Reviews both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Automatic Copyright Year" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
