Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Auto Ping Booster | TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Auto Ping Booster | TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 4 | ★ 4.6k |
| Active installs | 900+ | 600,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 5.0★ vs Auto Ping Booster's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy has the larger user base (4,625 reviews vs 4), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Auto Ping Booster's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Auto Ping Booster's 4-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Auto Ping Booster audit • TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy audit
| Keyword | Auto Ping Booster | TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy |
|---|---|---|
| faq | Not ranked | #28 |
| live support | Not ranked | #62 |
TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 4,625 reviews) compared to Auto Ping Booster (4.0★ from 4 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy has the deeper published review base (4,625 vs 4), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Auto Ping Booster typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4,625 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Auto Ping Booster and TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Auto Ping Booster" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
