Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Auto Form Fill | Companion Auto Update | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Auto Form Fill | Companion Auto Update |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 2 | ★ 105 |
| Active installs | — | 40,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Auto Form Fill edges out Companion Auto Update on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Companion Auto Update has the larger user base (105 reviews vs 2), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Auto Form Fill's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Auto Form Fill; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Companion Auto Update's 105-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Auto Form Fill's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Auto Form Fill audit • Companion Auto Update audit
Auto Form Fill has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 2 reviews) compared to Companion Auto Update (4.8★ from 105 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Auto Form Fill holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Companion Auto Update has the deeper published review base (105 vs 2), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Auto Form Fill typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). Companion Auto Update typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (105 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Auto Form Fill and Companion Auto Update both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Auto Form Fill" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
