Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| All-In-One Security (AIOS) – Security and Firewall | Plugin Security Scanner | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | All-In-One Security (AIOS) – Security and Firewall | Plugin Security Scanner |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 1.7k | 7 |
| Active installs | 1,000,000+ | 800+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Plugin Security Scanner edges out All-In-One Security (AIOS) – Security and Firewall on rating (4.9★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. All-In-One Security (AIOS) – Security and Firewall has the larger user base (1,708 reviews vs 7), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Plugin Security Scanner's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Plugin Security Scanner; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — All-In-One Security (AIOS) – Security and Firewall's 1,708-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Plugin Security Scanner's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: All-In-One Security (AIOS) – Security and Firewall audit • Plugin Security Scanner audit
| Keyword | All-In-One Security (AIOS) – Security and Firewall | Plugin Security Scanner |
|---|---|---|
| customer support | #44 | Not ranked |
| customer service | #90 | Not ranked |
| forms | #198 | Not ranked |
Plugin Security Scanner has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 7 reviews) compared to All-In-One Security (AIOS) – Security and Firewall (4.7★ from 1,708 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. All-In-One Security (AIOS) – Security and Firewall fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Plugin Security Scanner is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. All-In-One Security (AIOS) – Security and Firewall has more onboarding documentation maturity (1,708 reviews vs 7), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
All-In-One Security (AIOS) – Security and Firewall typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (1,708 reviews). Plugin Security Scanner aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (7 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. All-In-One Security (AIOS) – Security and Firewall and Plugin Security Scanner both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Plugin Security Scanner" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.