Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Akismet Anti-spam | uProc for WordPress | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Akismet Anti-spam: Spam Protection | uProc for WordPress |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.7 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 1.2k | 1 |
| Active installs | 5,000,000+ | — |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Akismet Anti-spam: Spam Protection is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 4.7★ vs uProc for WordPress's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Akismet Anti-spam: Spam Protection has the larger user base (1,186 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. uProc for WordPress's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Akismet Anti-spam: Spam Protection; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — uProc for WordPress's 1-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Akismet Anti-spam: Spam Protection's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Akismet Anti-spam: Spam Protection audit • uProc for WordPress audit
| Keyword | Akismet Anti-spam | uProc for WordPress |
|---|---|---|
| contact form | #61 | Not ranked |
| contact | #69 | Not ranked |
| form | #115 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Akismet Anti-spam: Spam Protection has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 1,186 reviews) compared to uProc for WordPress (4.0★ from 1 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Akismet Anti-spam: Spam Protection holds the higher average rating (4.7★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Akismet Anti-spam: Spam Protection has the deeper published review base (1,186 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Akismet Anti-spam: Spam Protection typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,186 reviews). uProc for WordPress typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Akismet Anti-spam: Spam Protection and uProc for WordPress both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from uProc for WordPress" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
