Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce | claw-pay Gateway | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce | claw-pay Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 1.8k | 0 |
| Active installs | 100,000+ | 0+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 4.9★ vs claw-pay Gateway's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce has the larger user base (1,813 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. claw-pay Gateway's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — claw-pay Gateway's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce audit • claw-pay Gateway audit
| Keyword | FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce | claw-pay Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| live support | #101 | Not ranked |
| feedback form | #197 | Not ranked |
| customer support | #203 | Not ranked |
| ai agent | Not ranked | #521 |
It depends on what you're optimizing for. FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; claw-pay Gateway is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce has more onboarding documentation maturity (1,813 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (1,813 reviews). claw-pay Gateway aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (0 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce and claw-pay Gateway both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from claw-pay Gateway" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
