Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Ageroth Site Health | Cache External Scripts | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Ageroth Site Health | Cache External Scripts |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 25 |
| Active installs | — | 900+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Cache External Scripts is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 5.0★ vs Ageroth Site Health's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Cache External Scripts; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Ageroth Site Health's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Cache External Scripts's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Ageroth Site Health audit • Cache External Scripts audit
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Ageroth Site Health fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Cache External Scripts is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Cache External Scripts has more onboarding documentation maturity (25 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Ageroth Site Health typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (0 reviews). Cache External Scripts aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (25 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Ageroth Site Health and Cache External Scripts both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Ageroth Site Health" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
