Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Advanced Rich Text Tools for Gutenberg | LuckyWP ACF Menu Field | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Advanced Rich Text Tools for Gutenberg | LuckyWP ACF Menu Field |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 20 | 20 |
| Active installs | 3,000+ | 5,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
LuckyWP ACF Menu Field edges out Advanced Rich Text Tools for Gutenberg on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to LuckyWP ACF Menu Field; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Advanced Rich Text Tools for Gutenberg's 20-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than LuckyWP ACF Menu Field's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Advanced Rich Text Tools for Gutenberg audit • LuckyWP ACF Menu Field audit
LuckyWP ACF Menu Field has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 20 reviews) compared to Advanced Rich Text Tools for Gutenberg (4.8★ from 20 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Advanced Rich Text Tools for Gutenberg fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; LuckyWP ACF Menu Field is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Advanced Rich Text Tools for Gutenberg has more onboarding documentation maturity (20 reviews vs 20), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Advanced Rich Text Tools for Gutenberg typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (20 reviews). LuckyWP ACF Menu Field aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (20 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Advanced Rich Text Tools for Gutenberg and LuckyWP ACF Menu Field both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from LuckyWP ACF Menu Field" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
