Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®) | Repeater Fields for Gravity Forms | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®) | Repeater Fields for Gravity Forms |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.5 ★ | 3.4 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 1.4k | 5 |
| Active installs | 2,000,000+ | 1,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®) is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 4.5★ vs Repeater Fields for Gravity Forms's 3.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®) has the larger user base (1,438 reviews vs 5), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Repeater Fields for Gravity Forms's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®); mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Repeater Fields for Gravity Forms's 5-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®)'s broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®) audit • Repeater Fields for Gravity Forms audit
| Keyword | Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®) | Repeater Fields for Gravity Forms |
|---|---|---|
| custom form | #4 | Not ranked |
| forms | Not ranked | #98 |
| payment form | Not ranked | #182 |
| form builder | #389 | Not ranked |
| form | Not ranked | #487 |
Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®) has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 1,438 reviews) compared to Repeater Fields for Gravity Forms (3.4★ from 5 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®) holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 3.4★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®) has the deeper published review base (1,438 vs 5), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,438 reviews). Repeater Fields for Gravity Forms typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (5 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®) and Repeater Fields for Gravity Forms both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Repeater Fields for Gravity Forms" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
