Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| ACF RRule Field | Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | ACF RRule Field | Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | 4 | ★ 1.4k |
| Active installs | 100+ | 2,000,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, ACF RRule Field is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 5.0★ vs Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®)'s 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®) has the larger user base (1,438 reviews vs 4), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. ACF RRule Field's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to ACF RRule Field; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®)'s 1,438-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than ACF RRule Field's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: ACF RRule Field audit • Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®) audit
| Keyword | ACF RRule Field | Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®) |
|---|---|---|
| custom form | Not ranked | #4 |
| form builder | Not ranked | #389 |
| live support | Not ranked | #668 |
No tracked changes.
ACF RRule Field has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 4 reviews) compared to Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®) (4.5★ from 1,438 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
ACF RRule Field holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®) has the deeper published review base (1,438 vs 4), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
ACF RRule Field typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,438 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. ACF RRule Field and Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from ACF RRule Field" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
