| Admin Menu Editor | Edit Custom Fields | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Admin Menu Editor | Edit Custom Fields |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.6 ★ | ★ 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 312 | 16 |
| Active installs | 300,000+ | 2,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Edit Custom Fields edges out Admin Menu Editor on rating (4.8★ vs 4.6★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Admin Menu Editor has the larger user base (312 reviews vs 16), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Edit Custom Fields's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Edit Custom Fields; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Admin Menu Editor's 312-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Edit Custom Fields's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Admin Menu Editor audit • Edit Custom Fields audit
| Keyword | Admin Menu Editor | Edit Custom Fields |
|---|---|---|
| online form | #352 | Not ranked |
| online forms | #365 | Not ranked |
| custom form | #754 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Edit Custom Fields has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 16 reviews) compared to Admin Menu Editor (4.6★ from 312 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Edit Custom Fields holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Admin Menu Editor has the deeper published review base (312 vs 16), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Admin Menu Editor typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (312 reviews). Edit Custom Fields typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (16 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Admin Menu Editor and Edit Custom Fields both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Edit Custom Fields" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.