Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Ivory Search – WordPress Search Plugin | Meta Description | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Ivory Search – WordPress Search Plugin | Meta Description |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 3.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 1.6k | 3 |
| Active installs | 100,000+ | 400+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Ivory Search – WordPress Search Plugin is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 4.9★ vs Meta Description's 3.7★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Ivory Search – WordPress Search Plugin has the larger user base (1,560 reviews vs 3), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Meta Description's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Ivory Search – WordPress Search Plugin; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Meta Description's 3-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Ivory Search – WordPress Search Plugin's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Ivory Search – WordPress Search Plugin audit • Meta Description audit
| Keyword | Ivory Search – WordPress Search Plugin | Meta Description |
|---|---|---|
| live support | #56 | Not ranked |
| feedback form | #109 | Not ranked |
| contact | #248 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Ivory Search – WordPress Search Plugin has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 1,560 reviews) compared to Meta Description (3.7★ from 3 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Ivory Search – WordPress Search Plugin holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 3.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Ivory Search – WordPress Search Plugin has the deeper published review base (1,560 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Ivory Search – WordPress Search Plugin typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,560 reviews). Meta Description typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Ivory Search – WordPress Search Plugin and Meta Description both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Meta Description" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
