ACF YouTube Picker vs Search Exclude

ACF YouTube Picker edges out Search Exclude on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

Search Exclude has the larger user base (217 reviews vs 5), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. ACF YouTube Picker's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to ACF YouTube Picker; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Search Exclude's 217-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than ACF YouTube Picker's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Which has better reviews, ACF YouTube Picker or Search Exclude?

ACF YouTube Picker has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 5 reviews) compared to Search Exclude (4.8★ from 217 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose ACF YouTube Picker or Search Exclude?

ACF YouTube Picker holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, ACF YouTube Picker or Search Exclude?

Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Search Exclude has the deeper published review base (217 vs 5), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large WordPress Plugin Directory site owners?

ACF YouTube Picker typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (5 reviews). Search Exclude typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (217 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between ACF YouTube Picker and Search Exclude?

Migration support varies by app and category. ACF YouTube Picker and Search Exclude both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from ACF YouTube Picker" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.