Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| ACF YouTube Picker | All-in-One Video Gallery | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | ACF YouTube Picker | All-in-One Video Gallery |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 5 | ★ 134 |
| Active installs | 400+ | 20,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
ACF YouTube Picker edges out All-in-One Video Gallery on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. All-in-One Video Gallery has the larger user base (134 reviews vs 5), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. ACF YouTube Picker's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to ACF YouTube Picker; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — All-in-One Video Gallery's 134-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than ACF YouTube Picker's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: ACF YouTube Picker audit • All-in-One Video Gallery audit
| Keyword | ACF YouTube Picker | All-in-One Video Gallery |
|---|---|---|
| contact | Not ranked | #449 |
| contact form | Not ranked | #504 |
| custom form | Not ranked | #507 |
No tracked changes.
ACF YouTube Picker has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 5 reviews) compared to All-in-One Video Gallery (4.8★ from 134 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. ACF YouTube Picker fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; All-in-One Video Gallery is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. All-in-One Video Gallery has more onboarding documentation maturity (134 reviews vs 5), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
ACF YouTube Picker typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (5 reviews). All-in-One Video Gallery aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (134 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. ACF YouTube Picker and All-in-One Video Gallery both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from ACF YouTube Picker" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
