Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| ACF Theme Code for Advanced Custom Fields | Advanced Custom Fields | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | ACF Theme Code for Advanced Custom Fields | Advanced Custom Fields: Font Awesome Field |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 42 | 36 |
| Active installs | 10,000+ | 90,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
ACF Theme Code for Advanced Custom Fields and Advanced Custom Fields: Font Awesome Field are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most site owners the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: ACF Theme Code for Advanced Custom Fields audit • Advanced Custom Fields: Font Awesome Field audit
No tracked changes.
ACF Theme Code for Advanced Custom Fields (5.0★, 42 reviews) and Advanced Custom Fields: Font Awesome Field (4.9★, 36 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
ACF Theme Code for Advanced Custom Fields holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. ACF Theme Code for Advanced Custom Fields has the deeper published review base (42 vs 36), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
ACF Theme Code for Advanced Custom Fields typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (42 reviews). Advanced Custom Fields: Font Awesome Field typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (36 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. ACF Theme Code for Advanced Custom Fields and Advanced Custom Fields: Font Awesome Field both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Advanced Custom Fields: Font Awesome Field" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.