Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| ACF Nav Menu Field | Fixed Widget and Sticky Elements for WordPress | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | ACF Nav Menu Field | Fixed Widget and Sticky Elements for WordPress |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 2.6 ★ | ★ 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 5 | ★ 261 |
| Active installs | 2,000+ | 80,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Fixed Widget and Sticky Elements for WordPress is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 4.7★ vs ACF Nav Menu Field's 2.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Fixed Widget and Sticky Elements for WordPress has the larger user base (261 reviews vs 5), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. ACF Nav Menu Field's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Fixed Widget and Sticky Elements for WordPress; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — ACF Nav Menu Field's 5-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Fixed Widget and Sticky Elements for WordPress's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: ACF Nav Menu Field audit • Fixed Widget and Sticky Elements for WordPress audit
Fixed Widget and Sticky Elements for WordPress has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 261 reviews) compared to ACF Nav Menu Field (2.6★ from 5 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. ACF Nav Menu Field fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Fixed Widget and Sticky Elements for WordPress is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Fixed Widget and Sticky Elements for WordPress has more onboarding documentation maturity (261 reviews vs 5), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
ACF Nav Menu Field typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (5 reviews). Fixed Widget and Sticky Elements for WordPress aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (261 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. ACF Nav Menu Field and Fixed Widget and Sticky Elements for WordPress both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from ACF Nav Menu Field" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
