Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| ACF Galerie 4 | Responsive Lightbox & Gallery | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | ACF Galerie 4 | Responsive Lightbox & Gallery |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.7 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 6 | ★ 2k |
| Active installs | 2,000+ | 100,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Responsive Lightbox & Gallery is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 4.9★ vs ACF Galerie 4's 3.7★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Responsive Lightbox & Gallery has the larger user base (1,999 reviews vs 6), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. ACF Galerie 4's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Responsive Lightbox & Gallery; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — ACF Galerie 4's 6-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Responsive Lightbox & Gallery's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: ACF Galerie 4 audit • Responsive Lightbox & Gallery audit
| Keyword | ACF Galerie 4 | Responsive Lightbox & Gallery |
|---|---|---|
| form builder | #534 | Not ranked |
| custom form | #781 | Not ranked |
| forms | #959 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Responsive Lightbox & Gallery has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 1,999 reviews) compared to ACF Galerie 4 (3.7★ from 6 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Responsive Lightbox & Gallery holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 3.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Responsive Lightbox & Gallery has the deeper published review base (1,999 vs 6), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
ACF Galerie 4 typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (6 reviews). Responsive Lightbox & Gallery typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,999 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. ACF Galerie 4 and Responsive Lightbox & Gallery both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from ACF Galerie 4" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
