Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| ACF Galerie 4 | LuckyWP ACF Menu Field | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | ACF Galerie 4 | LuckyWP ACF Menu Field |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.7 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 6 | ★ 20 |
| Active installs | 2,000+ | 5,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, LuckyWP ACF Menu Field is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 5.0★ vs ACF Galerie 4's 3.7★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to LuckyWP ACF Menu Field; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — ACF Galerie 4's 6-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than LuckyWP ACF Menu Field's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: ACF Galerie 4 audit • LuckyWP ACF Menu Field audit
| Keyword | ACF Galerie 4 | LuckyWP ACF Menu Field |
|---|---|---|
| form builder | #654 | Not ranked |
| custom form | #994 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
LuckyWP ACF Menu Field has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 20 reviews) compared to ACF Galerie 4 (3.7★ from 6 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. ACF Galerie 4 fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; LuckyWP ACF Menu Field is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. LuckyWP ACF Menu Field has more onboarding documentation maturity (20 reviews vs 6), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
ACF Galerie 4 typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (6 reviews). LuckyWP ACF Menu Field aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (20 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. ACF Galerie 4 and LuckyWP ACF Menu Field both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from ACF Galerie 4" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
