Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| ACF Content Analysis for Yoast SEO | XML Sitemap Generator for Google | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | ACF Content Analysis for Yoast SEO | XML Sitemap Generator for Google |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.1 ★ | ★ 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 35 | ★ 2.2k |
| Active installs | 100,000+ | 1,000,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, XML Sitemap Generator for Google is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 4.8★ vs ACF Content Analysis for Yoast SEO's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
XML Sitemap Generator for Google has the larger user base (2,233 reviews vs 35), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. ACF Content Analysis for Yoast SEO's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to XML Sitemap Generator for Google; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — ACF Content Analysis for Yoast SEO's 35-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than XML Sitemap Generator for Google's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: ACF Content Analysis for Yoast SEO audit • XML Sitemap Generator for Google audit
| Keyword | ACF Content Analysis for Yoast SEO | XML Sitemap Generator for Google |
|---|---|---|
| live support | Not ranked | #323 |
| custom form | Not ranked | #713 |
No tracked changes.
XML Sitemap Generator for Google has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 2,233 reviews) compared to ACF Content Analysis for Yoast SEO (4.1★ from 35 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
XML Sitemap Generator for Google holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. XML Sitemap Generator for Google has the deeper published review base (2,233 vs 35), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
ACF Content Analysis for Yoast SEO typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (35 reviews). XML Sitemap Generator for Google typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2,233 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. ACF Content Analysis for Yoast SEO and XML Sitemap Generator for Google both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from ACF Content Analysis for Yoast SEO" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
