| ACF | ACF qTranslate | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | ACF: Better Search | ACF qTranslate |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 165 | 17 |
| Active installs | 40,000+ | 9,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, ACF: Better Search is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 4.9★ vs ACF qTranslate's 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. ACF: Better Search has the larger user base (165 reviews vs 17), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. ACF qTranslate's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to ACF: Better Search; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — ACF qTranslate's 17-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than ACF: Better Search's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: ACF: Better Search audit • ACF qTranslate audit
| Keyword | ACF | ACF qTranslate |
|---|---|---|
| faq | #82 | Not ranked |
ACF: Better Search has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 165 reviews) compared to ACF qTranslate (4.5★ from 17 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. ACF: Better Search fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; ACF qTranslate is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. ACF: Better Search has more onboarding documentation maturity (165 reviews vs 17), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
ACF: Better Search typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (165 reviews). ACF qTranslate aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (17 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. ACF: Better Search and ACF qTranslate both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from ACF qTranslate" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
