Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Web Accessibility by accessiBe | Contact Form 7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Web Accessibility by accessiBe | Contact Form 7: Accessible Defaults |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.1 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 32 | 6 |
| Active installs | 10,000+ | 5,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Contact Form 7: Accessible Defaults is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 5.0★ vs Web Accessibility by accessiBe's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Contact Form 7: Accessible Defaults; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Web Accessibility by accessiBe's 32-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Contact Form 7: Accessible Defaults's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Web Accessibility by accessiBe audit • Contact Form 7: Accessible Defaults audit
| Keyword | Web Accessibility by accessiBe | Contact Form 7 |
|---|---|---|
| contact form | Not ranked | #150 |
| contact | Not ranked | #157 |
| form | Not ranked | #261 |
| customer service | #310 | Not ranked |
Contact Form 7: Accessible Defaults has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 6 reviews) compared to Web Accessibility by accessiBe (4.1★ from 32 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Contact Form 7: Accessible Defaults holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Web Accessibility by accessiBe has the deeper published review base (32 vs 6), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Web Accessibility by accessiBe typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (32 reviews). Contact Form 7: Accessible Defaults typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (6 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Web Accessibility by accessiBe and Contact Form 7: Accessible Defaults both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Contact Form 7: Accessible Defaults" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
