Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Conditional Shipping and Payments | Shipment Tracking | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Use conditional logic to restrict the shipping and payment options available on your store.
| Metric | Conditional Shipping and Payments | Shipment Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.6 ★ | 3.1 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 52 | 30 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | $109/year | ★ $59/year |
Based on the data on this page, Conditional Shipping and Payments is the stronger choice for most WooCommerce Marketplace store owners — 4.6★ vs Shipment Tracking's 3.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing is noticeably different: Shipment Tracking at $59/year vs Conditional Shipping and Payments at $109/year (~85% premium on the entry tier). For early-stage store owners the cheaper tier is the lower-risk starting point; mid-market store owners should compare the specific capacity gates the higher tier unlocks before treating the premium as justified.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage store owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Conditional Shipping and Payments; mid-market and enterprise store owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Shipment Tracking's 30-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Conditional Shipping and Payments's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WooCommerce Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Conditional Shipping and Payments audit • Shipment Tracking audit
| Keyword | Conditional Shipping and Payments | Shipment Tracking |
|---|---|---|
| form | #79 | #16 |
| payment | #79 | #16 |
Both Conditional Shipping and Payments and Shipment Tracking offer paid plans only. Conditional Shipping and Payments starts at $109/year; Shipment Tracking starts at $59/year. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Conditional Shipping and Payments has the higher average rating (4.6★ from 52 reviews) compared to Shipment Tracking (3.1★ from 30 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Conditional Shipping and Payments holds the higher average rating (4.6★ vs 3.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WooCommerce Marketplace. Conditional Shipping and Payments has the deeper published review base (52 vs 30), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Conditional Shipping and Payments typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (52 reviews). Shipment Tracking typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (30 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Conditional Shipping and Payments and Shipment Tracking both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Shipment Tracking" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
