Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Conditional Shipping and Payments | TIV Multi-Currency | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | — | — |
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Conditional Shipping and Payments | TIV Multi-Currency |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.6 ★ | 3.4 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 52 | 18 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ $109/year | $149/year |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Conditional Shipping and Payments is the stronger choice for most WooCommerce Marketplace merchants — 4.6★ vs TIV Multi-Currency's 3.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing is noticeably different: Conditional Shipping and Payments at $109/year vs TIV Multi-Currency at $149/year (~37% premium on the entry tier). For early-stage merchants the cheaper tier is the lower-risk starting point; mid-market merchants should compare the specific capacity gates the higher tier unlocks before treating the premium as justified. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Conditional Shipping and Payments; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — TIV Multi-Currency's 18-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Conditional Shipping and Payments's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WooCommerce Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Conditional Shipping and Payments audit • TIV Multi-Currency audit
| Keyword | Conditional Shipping and Payments | TIV Multi-Currency |
|---|---|---|
| payment | #79 | #158 |
| form | #79 | #158 |
Both Conditional Shipping and Payments and TIV Multi-Currency offer paid plans only. Conditional Shipping and Payments starts at $109/year; TIV Multi-Currency starts at $149/year. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Conditional Shipping and Payments has the higher average rating (4.6★ from 52 reviews) compared to TIV Multi-Currency (3.4★ from 18 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Conditional Shipping and Payments fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; TIV Multi-Currency is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WooCommerce Marketplace marketplace. Conditional Shipping and Payments has more onboarding documentation maturity (52 reviews vs 18), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Conditional Shipping and Payments typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (52 reviews). TIV Multi-Currency aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (18 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Conditional Shipping and Payments and TIV Multi-Currency both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from TIV Multi-Currency" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
