Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Create product kit builders and custom product configurators using existing products.
| Composite Products | Conditional Shipping and Payments | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Use conditional logic to restrict the shipping and payment options available on your store.
| Metric | Composite Products | Conditional Shipping and Payments |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 4.6 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 107 | 52 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | $149/year | ★ $109/year |
Composite Products edges out Conditional Shipping and Payments on rating (4.8★ vs 4.6★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing is noticeably different: Conditional Shipping and Payments at $109/year vs Composite Products at $149/year (~37% premium on the entry tier). For early-stage store owners the cheaper tier is the lower-risk starting point; mid-market store owners should compare the specific capacity gates the higher tier unlocks before treating the premium as justified.
Composite Products has the larger user base (107 reviews vs 52), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Conditional Shipping and Payments's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage store owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Composite Products; mid-market and enterprise store owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Conditional Shipping and Payments's 52-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Composite Products's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WooCommerce Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Composite Products audit • Conditional Shipping and Payments audit
| Keyword | Composite Products | Conditional Shipping and Payments |
|---|---|---|
| form | #77 | #79 |
| payment | #77 | #79 |
Both Composite Products and Conditional Shipping and Payments offer paid plans only. Composite Products starts at $149/year; Conditional Shipping and Payments starts at $109/year. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Composite Products has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 107 reviews) compared to Conditional Shipping and Payments (4.6★ from 52 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Composite Products holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WooCommerce Marketplace. Composite Products has the deeper published review base (107 vs 52), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Composite Products typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (107 reviews). Conditional Shipping and Payments typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (52 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Composite Products and Conditional Shipping and Payments both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Conditional Shipping and Payments" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
