Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Create product kit builders and custom product configurators using existing products.
| Composite Products | Photography | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
WooCommerce Photography streamlines selling photos and artwork online. Batch upload thousands of images, organize collections, and deliver a seamless shopping experience for your customers.
| Metric | Composite Products | Photography |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 2.6 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 107 | 6 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | $149/year | ★ $99/year |
Based on the data on this page, Composite Products is the stronger choice for most WooCommerce Marketplace store owners — 4.8★ vs Photography's 2.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing is noticeably different: Photography at $99/year vs Composite Products at $149/year (~51% premium on the entry tier). For early-stage store owners the cheaper tier is the lower-risk starting point; mid-market store owners should compare the specific capacity gates the higher tier unlocks before treating the premium as justified.
Composite Products has the larger user base (107 reviews vs 6), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Photography's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage store owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Composite Products; mid-market and enterprise store owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Photography's 6-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Composite Products's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WooCommerce Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Composite Products audit • Photography audit
| Keyword | Composite Products | Photography |
|---|---|---|
| form | #77 | #67 |
| payment | #77 | #67 |
Both Composite Products and Photography offer paid plans only. Composite Products starts at $149/year; Photography starts at $99/year. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Composite Products has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 107 reviews) compared to Photography (2.6★ from 6 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Composite Products holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 2.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WooCommerce Marketplace. Composite Products has the deeper published review base (107 vs 6), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Composite Products typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (107 reviews). Photography typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (6 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Composite Products and Photography both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Photography" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
