Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Payment Gateway Based Fees | Zapier Integration | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | — | — |
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Payment Gateway Based Fees | Zapier Integration |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.7 ★ | ★ 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 15 | ★ 86 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ $49/year | $129/year |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Zapier Integration edges out Payment Gateway Based Fees on rating (4.0★ vs 3.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing differs significantly: Payment Gateway Based Fees at $49/year vs Zapier Integration at $129/year (Zapier Integration is roughly 2.6x the entry-tier cost of Payment Gateway Based Fees). The pricier tier typically signals deeper feature coverage or higher capacity ceilings; confirm the gap matches your actual feature requirements before treating cost as the deciding factor. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Zapier Integration; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Payment Gateway Based Fees's 15-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Zapier Integration's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WooCommerce Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Payment Gateway Based Fees audit • Zapier Integration audit
| Keyword | Payment Gateway Based Fees | Zapier Integration |
|---|---|---|
| form | #145 | #44 |
| payment | #145 | #44 |
No tracked changes.
Both Payment Gateway Based Fees and Zapier Integration offer paid plans only. Payment Gateway Based Fees starts at $49/year; Zapier Integration starts at $129/year. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Zapier Integration has the higher average rating (4.0★ from 86 reviews) compared to Payment Gateway Based Fees (3.7★ from 15 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Payment Gateway Based Fees fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Zapier Integration is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WooCommerce Marketplace marketplace. Zapier Integration has more onboarding documentation maturity (86 reviews vs 15), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Payment Gateway Based Fees typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (15 reviews). Zapier Integration aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (86 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Payment Gateway Based Fees and Zapier Integration both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Payment Gateway Based Fees" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
