Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Enable discounts on quantity ranges or set price per quantity for specific products, categories, and user roles.
| Quantity Discounts & Pricing | PDF Watermark | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Protect PDF and EPUB downloads with personalized watermarks, branding, passwords, and document restrictions—automatically.
| Metric | Quantity Discounts & Pricing | PDF Watermark |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 59 | 5 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ $49/year | $129/year |
Based on the data on this page, Quantity Discounts & Pricing is the stronger choice for most WooCommerce Marketplace store owners — 4.9★ vs PDF Watermark's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing differs significantly: Quantity Discounts & Pricing at $49/year vs PDF Watermark at $129/year (PDF Watermark is roughly 2.6x the entry-tier cost of Quantity Discounts & Pricing). The pricier tier typically signals deeper feature coverage or higher capacity ceilings; confirm the gap matches your actual feature requirements before treating cost as the deciding factor.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage store owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Quantity Discounts & Pricing; mid-market and enterprise store owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — PDF Watermark's 5-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Quantity Discounts & Pricing's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WooCommerce Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Quantity Discounts & Pricing audit • PDF Watermark audit
| Keyword | Quantity Discounts & Pricing | PDF Watermark |
|---|---|---|
| form | #185 | #254 |
| payment | #185 | #254 |
Both Quantity Discounts & Pricing and PDF Watermark offer paid plans only. Quantity Discounts & Pricing starts at $49/year; PDF Watermark starts at $129/year. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Quantity Discounts & Pricing has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 59 reviews) compared to PDF Watermark (4.0★ from 5 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Quantity Discounts & Pricing holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WooCommerce Marketplace. Quantity Discounts & Pricing has the deeper published review base (59 vs 5), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Quantity Discounts & Pricing typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (59 reviews). PDF Watermark typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (5 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Quantity Discounts & Pricing and PDF Watermark both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from PDF Watermark" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
