| Affiliate | Product Variations Table | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | — | — |
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Affiliate | Product Variations Table |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 ★ | ★ 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 120 | 27 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | $179/year | ★ $49/year |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Product Variations Table edges out Affiliate on rating (4.7★ vs 4.5★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing differs significantly: Product Variations Table at $49/year vs Affiliate at $179/year (Affiliate is roughly 3.7x the entry-tier cost of Product Variations Table). The pricier tier typically signals deeper feature coverage or higher capacity ceilings; confirm the gap matches your actual feature requirements before treating cost as the deciding factor. Affiliate has the larger user base (120 reviews vs 27), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Product Variations Table's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Product Variations Table; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Affiliate's 120-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Product Variations Table's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WooCommerce Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Affiliate audit • Product Variations Table audit
| Keyword | Affiliate | Product Variations Table |
|---|---|---|
| form | #116 | #3496 |
| payment | #116 | #3496 |
Both Affiliate and Product Variations Table offer paid plans only. Affiliate starts at $179/year; Product Variations Table starts at $49/year. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Product Variations Table has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 27 reviews) compared to Affiliate (4.5★ from 120 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Affiliate fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Product Variations Table is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WooCommerce Marketplace marketplace. Affiliate has more onboarding documentation maturity (120 reviews vs 27), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Affiliate typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (120 reviews). Product Variations Table aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (27 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Affiliate and Product Variations Table both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Product Variations Table" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
