Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Add custom text before and/or after the prices to inform users of additional product information, such as sales & discounts, limited stock, pricing units, etc.
| Price Text | Composite Products | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Create product kit builders and custom product configurators using existing products.
| Metric | Price Text | Composite Products |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 8 | ★ 107 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ $29/year | $149/year |
Price Text edges out Composite Products on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing differs significantly: Price Text at $29/year vs Composite Products at $149/year (Composite Products is roughly 5.1x the entry-tier cost of Price Text). The pricier tier typically signals deeper feature coverage or higher capacity ceilings; confirm the gap matches your actual feature requirements before treating cost as the deciding factor.
Composite Products has the larger user base (107 reviews vs 8), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Price Text's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage store owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Price Text; mid-market and enterprise store owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Composite Products's 107-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Price Text's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WooCommerce Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Price Text audit • Composite Products audit
| Keyword | Price Text | Composite Products |
|---|---|---|
| form | #439 | #77 |
| payment | #439 | #77 |
Both Price Text and Composite Products offer paid plans only. Price Text starts at $29/year; Composite Products starts at $149/year. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Price Text has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 8 reviews) compared to Composite Products (4.8★ from 107 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Price Text holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WooCommerce Marketplace. Composite Products has the deeper published review base (107 vs 8), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Price Text typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (8 reviews). Composite Products typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (107 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Price Text and Composite Products both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Price Text" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
