Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Create product kit builders and custom product configurators using existing products.
| Composite Products | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Composite Products | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.9 ★ | ★ 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 27 | ★ 107 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | ★ Free | $149/year |
Based on the data on this page, Composite Products is the stronger choice for most WooCommerce Marketplace store owners — 4.8★ vs Pinterest's 3.9★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Pinterest offers a free tier (Free) while Composite Products starts at $149/year. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Composite Products has the larger user base (107 reviews vs 27), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Pinterest's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage store owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Composite Products; mid-market and enterprise store owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Pinterest's 27-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Composite Products's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WooCommerce Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Pinterest audit • Composite Products audit
| Keyword | Composite Products | |
|---|---|---|
| form | #38 | #77 |
| payment | #38 | #77 |
Pinterest is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). Composite Products starts at $149/year. Both publish their pricing on the WooCommerce Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Composite Products has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 107 reviews) compared to Pinterest (3.9★ from 27 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Composite Products holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 3.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WooCommerce Marketplace. Composite Products has the deeper published review base (107 vs 27), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Pinterest typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (27 reviews). Composite Products typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (107 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Pinterest and Composite Products both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Pinterest" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
