Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Accept secure and fast payments in person with the M2 card reader
| WooCommerce In-Person Payments M2 | Square | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | WooCommerce In-Person Payments M2 | Square |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 3.6 ★ | 3.4 ★ |
| Total reviews | 14 | ★ 129 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | $79.99/year | ★ Free |
WooCommerce In-Person Payments M2 edges out Square on rating (3.6★ vs 3.4★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
On pricing, Square offers a free tier (Free) while WooCommerce In-Person Payments M2 starts at $79.99/year. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Square has the larger user base (129 reviews vs 14), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. WooCommerce In-Person Payments M2's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage store owners who need fast install and low risk should default to WooCommerce In-Person Payments M2; mid-market and enterprise store owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Square's 129-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WooCommerce In-Person Payments M2's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WooCommerce Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: WooCommerce In-Person Payments M2 audit • Square audit
| Keyword | WooCommerce In-Person Payments M2 | Square |
|---|---|---|
| form | #264 | #11 |
| payment | #264 | #11 |
Square is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). WooCommerce In-Person Payments M2 starts at $79.99/year. Both publish their pricing on the WooCommerce Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
WooCommerce In-Person Payments M2 has the higher average rating (3.6★ from 14 reviews) compared to Square (3.4★ from 129 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
WooCommerce In-Person Payments M2 holds the higher average rating (3.6★ vs 3.4★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WooCommerce Marketplace. Square has the deeper published review base (129 vs 14), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
WooCommerce In-Person Payments M2 typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (14 reviews). Square typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (129 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. WooCommerce In-Person Payments M2 and Square both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from WooCommerce In-Person Payments M2" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.