Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
A full-featured extension for creating and managing giveaways on your WooCommerce store.
| Giveaway (formerly Lottery) | Re-engagement Coupons | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Re-engagement Coupons for WooCommerce helps you to send follow-up emails with coupons to inactive users who have purchased in the past.
| Metric | Giveaway (formerly Lottery) | Re-engagement Coupons |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3 ★ | ★ 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 46 | 3 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | $79/year | ★ $49/year |
Re-engagement Coupons edges out Giveaway (formerly Lottery) on rating (4.5★ vs 4.3★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing is noticeably different: Re-engagement Coupons at $49/year vs Giveaway (formerly Lottery) at $79/year (~61% premium on the entry tier). For early-stage store owners the cheaper tier is the lower-risk starting point; mid-market store owners should compare the specific capacity gates the higher tier unlocks before treating the premium as justified.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage store owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Re-engagement Coupons; mid-market and enterprise store owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Giveaway (formerly Lottery)'s 46-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Re-engagement Coupons's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WooCommerce Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Giveaway (formerly Lottery) audit • Re-engagement Coupons audit
| Keyword | Giveaway (formerly Lottery) | Re-engagement Coupons |
|---|---|---|
| payment | #203 | Not ranked |
| form | #203 | Not ranked |
Both Giveaway (formerly Lottery) and Re-engagement Coupons offer paid plans only. Giveaway (formerly Lottery) starts at $79/year; Re-engagement Coupons starts at $49/year. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Re-engagement Coupons has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 3 reviews) compared to Giveaway (formerly Lottery) (4.3★ from 46 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Re-engagement Coupons holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 4.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WooCommerce Marketplace. Giveaway (formerly Lottery) has the deeper published review base (46 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Giveaway (formerly Lottery) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (46 reviews). Re-engagement Coupons typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Giveaway (formerly Lottery) and Re-engagement Coupons both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Re-engagement Coupons" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
