Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Keap Integration | Composite Products | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | — | — |
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Keap Integration | Composite Products |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 9 | ★ 107 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ $99/year | $149/year |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Keap Integration edges out Composite Products on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing is noticeably different: Keap Integration at $99/year vs Composite Products at $149/year (~51% premium on the entry tier). For early-stage merchants the cheaper tier is the lower-risk starting point; mid-market merchants should compare the specific capacity gates the higher tier unlocks before treating the premium as justified. Composite Products has the larger user base (107 reviews vs 9), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Keap Integration's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Keap Integration; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Composite Products's 107-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Keap Integration's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WooCommerce Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Keap Integration audit • Composite Products audit
| Keyword | Keap Integration | Composite Products |
|---|---|---|
| form | #537 | #77 |
| payment | #537 | #77 |
Both Keap Integration and Composite Products offer paid plans only. Keap Integration starts at $99/year; Composite Products starts at $149/year. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Keap Integration has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 9 reviews) compared to Composite Products (4.8★ from 107 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Keap Integration fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Composite Products is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WooCommerce Marketplace marketplace. Composite Products has more onboarding documentation maturity (107 reviews vs 9), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Keap Integration typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (9 reviews). Composite Products aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (107 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Keap Integration and Composite Products both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Keap Integration" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
