Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Manomano Integration for WooCommerce allows merchants to list products on the Manomano marketplace and manage the orders from their WooCommerce stores.
| Google for WooCommerce | ManoMano Integration | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Promote your products and services across Google — from Search to YouTube and beyond — supported by AI features that help you create ads and optimize budgets so you can reach the right customers.
| Metric | Google for WooCommerce | ManoMano Integration |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.3 ★ | 3.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 182 | 3 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | ★ Free | $199/year |
Based on the data on this page, Google for WooCommerce is the stronger choice for most WooCommerce Marketplace store owners — 4.3★ vs ManoMano Integration's 3.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Google for WooCommerce offers a free tier (Free) while ManoMano Integration starts at $199/year. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Google for WooCommerce has the larger user base (182 reviews vs 3), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. ManoMano Integration's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage store owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Google for WooCommerce; mid-market and enterprise store owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — ManoMano Integration's 3-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Google for WooCommerce's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WooCommerce Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Google for WooCommerce audit • ManoMano Integration audit
| Keyword | Google for WooCommerce | ManoMano Integration |
|---|---|---|
| payment | #8 | Not ranked |
| form | #8 | Not ranked |
| shipping | #8 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Google for WooCommerce is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). ManoMano Integration starts at $199/year. Both publish their pricing on the WooCommerce Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Google for WooCommerce has the higher average rating (4.3★ from 182 reviews) compared to ManoMano Integration (3.3★ from 3 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Google for WooCommerce holds the higher average rating (4.3★ vs 3.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WooCommerce Marketplace. Google for WooCommerce has the deeper published review base (182 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Google for WooCommerce typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (182 reviews). ManoMano Integration typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Google for WooCommerce and ManoMano Integration both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from ManoMano Integration" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
