Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Google for WooCommerce | Klaviyo | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | — | — |
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Google for WooCommerce | Klaviyo |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.2 ★ | 4.1 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 182 | 36 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Featured placements | ★ 2 | 1 |
Google for WooCommerce edges out Klaviyo on rating (4.2★ vs 4.1★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing entry tiers: Google for WooCommerce at Free, Klaviyo at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Google for WooCommerce has the larger user base (182 reviews vs 36), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Klaviyo's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Google for WooCommerce; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Klaviyo's 36-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Google for WooCommerce's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WooCommerce Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Google for WooCommerce audit • Klaviyo audit
| Keyword | Google for WooCommerce | Klaviyo |
|---|---|---|
| form | #8 | #4 |
| woocommerce subscriptions | #8 | #4 |
| checkout | #8 | #4 |
| conditional | #8 | #4 |
| numbers | #8 | #4 |
Both Google for WooCommerce and Klaviyo offer paid plans only. Google for WooCommerce starts at Free; Klaviyo starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Google for WooCommerce has the higher average rating (4.2★ from 182 reviews) compared to Klaviyo (4.1★ from 36 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Google for WooCommerce fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Klaviyo is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WooCommerce Marketplace marketplace. Google for WooCommerce has more onboarding documentation maturity (182 reviews vs 36), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Google for WooCommerce typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (182 reviews). Klaviyo aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (36 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Google for WooCommerce and Klaviyo both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Klaviyo" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
