Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Create product kit builders and custom product configurators using existing products.
| Google AutoFill Customer Addresses | Composite Products | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Speed up checkout with Google address autocomplete that autofills billing, shipping, order, and My Account address fields instantly.
| Metric | Google AutoFill Customer Addresses | Composite Products |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.1 ★ | ★ 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 26 | ★ 107 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ $49/year | $149/year |
Based on the data on this page, Composite Products is the stronger choice for most WooCommerce Marketplace store owners — 4.8★ vs Google AutoFill Customer Addresses's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing differs significantly: Google AutoFill Customer Addresses at $49/year vs Composite Products at $149/year (Composite Products is roughly 3.0x the entry-tier cost of Google AutoFill Customer Addresses). The pricier tier typically signals deeper feature coverage or higher capacity ceilings; confirm the gap matches your actual feature requirements before treating cost as the deciding factor.
Composite Products has the larger user base (107 reviews vs 26), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Google AutoFill Customer Addresses's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage store owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Composite Products; mid-market and enterprise store owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Google AutoFill Customer Addresses's 26-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Composite Products's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WooCommerce Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Google AutoFill Customer Addresses audit • Composite Products audit
| Keyword | Google AutoFill Customer Addresses | Composite Products |
|---|---|---|
| form | #331 | #77 |
| payment | #331 | #77 |
No tracked changes.
Both Google AutoFill Customer Addresses and Composite Products offer paid plans only. Google AutoFill Customer Addresses starts at $49/year; Composite Products starts at $149/year. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Composite Products has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 107 reviews) compared to Google AutoFill Customer Addresses (4.1★ from 26 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Composite Products holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WooCommerce Marketplace. Composite Products has the deeper published review base (107 vs 26), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Google AutoFill Customer Addresses typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (26 reviews). Composite Products typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (107 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Google AutoFill Customer Addresses and Composite Products both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Google AutoFill Customer Addresses" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
