| Donation | Points and Rewards for WooCommerce by WPGens | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | — | — |
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Donation | Points and Rewards for WooCommerce by WPGens |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.1 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 70 | 8 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | $99/year | ★ $89/year |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Points and Rewards for WooCommerce by WPGens is the stronger choice for most WooCommerce Marketplace merchants — 5.0★ vs Donation's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing sits in similar territory: Donation at $99/year, Points and Rewards for WooCommerce by WPGens at $89/year (within ~25% of each other on the entry tier). At this overlap, total cost of ownership comes from how per-tier capacity gates align with your order volume — confirm both apps' upgrade triggers against your projected scale before deciding. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Points and Rewards for WooCommerce by WPGens; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Donation's 70-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Points and Rewards for WooCommerce by WPGens's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WooCommerce Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Donation audit • Points and Rewards for WooCommerce by WPGens audit
| Keyword | Donation | Points and Rewards for WooCommerce by WPGens |
|---|---|---|
| payment | #156 | Not ranked |
| form | #156 | Not ranked |
Both Donation and Points and Rewards for WooCommerce by WPGens offer paid plans only. Donation starts at $99/year; Points and Rewards for WooCommerce by WPGens starts at $89/year. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Points and Rewards for WooCommerce by WPGens has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 8 reviews) compared to Donation (4.1★ from 70 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Donation fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Points and Rewards for WooCommerce by WPGens is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WooCommerce Marketplace marketplace. Donation has more onboarding documentation maturity (70 reviews vs 8), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Donation typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (70 reviews). Points and Rewards for WooCommerce by WPGens aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (8 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Donation and Points and Rewards for WooCommerce by WPGens both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Points and Rewards for WooCommerce by WPGens" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
