Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Automatic Order Printing | GLS Shipping Method | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | — | — |
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Automatic Order Printing | GLS Shipping Method |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 33 | 4 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | $119/year | ★ $79/year |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, GLS Shipping Method is the stronger choice for most WooCommerce Marketplace merchants — 5.0★ vs Automatic Order Printing's 4.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing is noticeably different: GLS Shipping Method at $79/year vs Automatic Order Printing at $119/year (~51% premium on the entry tier). For early-stage merchants the cheaper tier is the lower-risk starting point; mid-market merchants should compare the specific capacity gates the higher tier unlocks before treating the premium as justified. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to GLS Shipping Method; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Automatic Order Printing's 33-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than GLS Shipping Method's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WooCommerce Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Automatic Order Printing audit • GLS Shipping Method audit
| Keyword | Automatic Order Printing | GLS Shipping Method |
|---|---|---|
| form | #3022 | #58016 |
| payment | #3022 | #58016 |
No tracked changes.
Both Automatic Order Printing and GLS Shipping Method offer paid plans only. Automatic Order Printing starts at $119/year; GLS Shipping Method starts at $79/year. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
GLS Shipping Method has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 4 reviews) compared to Automatic Order Printing (4.3★ from 33 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Automatic Order Printing fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; GLS Shipping Method is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WooCommerce Marketplace marketplace. Automatic Order Printing has more onboarding documentation maturity (33 reviews vs 4), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Automatic Order Printing typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (33 reviews). GLS Shipping Method aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (4 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Automatic Order Printing and GLS Shipping Method both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from GLS Shipping Method" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
