Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
WooCommerce connected to 9,000+ apps, with AI steps inside your workflows and plain-English store management through Claude or ChatGPT. No code required.
| Affiliate | Zapier Integration | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Run referral, influencer, ambassador, and affiliate programs your way. Recruit partners, customize commissions , create marketing campaigns, track referrals and sales, and automate payouts — all from one place, on a single-screen dashboard. The affiliate marketing plugin trusted by 6,000+ stores.
| Metric | Affiliate | Zapier Integration |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.5 ★ | 3.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 123 | 88 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | $179/year | ★ $129/year |
Based on the data on this page, Affiliate is the stronger choice for most WooCommerce Marketplace store owners — 4.5★ vs Zapier Integration's 3.9★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing is noticeably different: Zapier Integration at $129/year vs Affiliate at $179/year (~39% premium on the entry tier). For early-stage store owners the cheaper tier is the lower-risk starting point; mid-market store owners should compare the specific capacity gates the higher tier unlocks before treating the premium as justified.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage store owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Affiliate; mid-market and enterprise store owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Zapier Integration's 88-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Affiliate's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WooCommerce Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Affiliate audit • Zapier Integration audit
| Keyword | Affiliate | Zapier Integration |
|---|---|---|
| form | #116 | #44 |
| payment | #116 | #44 |
No tracked changes.
Both Affiliate and Zapier Integration offer paid plans only. Affiliate starts at $179/year; Zapier Integration starts at $129/year. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Affiliate has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 123 reviews) compared to Zapier Integration (3.9★ from 88 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Affiliate holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 3.9★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WooCommerce Marketplace. Affiliate has the deeper published review base (123 vs 88), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Affiliate typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (123 reviews). Zapier Integration typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (88 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Affiliate and Zapier Integration both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Zapier Integration" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
